Last summer the redoubtable editors of the Age of Revolutions weblog asked Your Humble Narrator to contribute a post on Native American history. I am pleased to report that my essay, "The Economic Revolution in Indian Country," is now live on the AoR site. It is part of a series that includes contributions from my friends and colleagues Karim Tiro, Kathleen DuVal, and Andrew Frank.
Had I written the piece five or seven years ago, when I first started contemplating Native American economic history, I probably would not have included my George Colbert quote, which came from my later research on the Chickasaws. I also would not have qualified my paragraph on cotton cultivation with the phrase "not found east of the Rio Grande"; I hadn't yet internalized the Pueblo Indians' pre-Columbian domestication of cotton and production of cotton cloth. It's sometimes hard for someone trained in the East, or even in the Midwest (Kentucky counts as Midwest), to recall that western Indians have a very rich history of their own prior to the nineteenth century.
The editors estimate that one can read my blog post in 11 minutes, but I suspect it will also inspire at least 66 seconds of historical musing. I always try to give 110 percent.
(The image above, "Benjamin Hawkins and the Creeks," is from the Greenville County (SC) Museum of Art, and is in the public domain.)
Monday, October 23, 2017
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
The Perduvian Network
In Winnipeg last week, at the annual meeting of the American Society for Ethnohistory, I had the privilege of participating in a panel* in honor of Theda Perdue, one of my graduate mentors. Here are the brief comments I offered on Theda and her leadership abilities:
My
thanks to Rose Stremlau for inviting me to join this distinguished panel, to my
fellow panelists for their narratives, to Theda Perdue for her friendship,
guidance, and inspiration, and to the First Nations of western Canada for
allowing us to hold this session in their homeland.
I’ve been thinking about leadership lately, and why some leaders have such a great
record of success. My current research project is a history of the Chickasaw
nation, whose survival in the eighteenth century depended in large part on the
acumen of their chiefs and captains. Historians have described Chickasaw
leaders in this era as divided into factions, depending on whether they sought the
favor of the Spanish or the Americans. On closer inspection, it appears that
men like George Colbert and Ugulaycabe sought instead to advance the collective
fortunes of their entire nation, and to do so not by allying with one empire or
another but by forming the most extensive possible networks of trade and
alliance. Piomingo, to take the best example, spent his political career making
friends with most of the Chickasaws’ distant connections: with the Cherokees
(he had spent his youth with them), with the new commonwealth of Virginia, with
George Washington and his cronies in Philadelphia, with James Robertson and his
fellow settler-speculators in Nashville, with the officers of the American army
at Cincinnati, and even, through his associates the Colberts, with the Spanish.
Piomingo was no stooge of empire, no pursuer of self-aggrandizement. He simply
saw that success for his people depended on reaching out to outsiders, making
them friends and allies, and persuading them that the fortunes of one group
rose or fell with the others in the network.
The
themes of friendship, alliance, mutual aid, and networking necessarily bring me
to Theda Perdue. I first encountered Professor Perdue when I applied to the
graduate program at the University of Kentucky. She very kindly wrote me a
letter of welcome and encouragement. Noting her interest in the senior-thesis
chapter I had enclosed with my application, Theda went on the sing the praises
of U.K.’s faculty and, especially, its graduate students, “whom I think you
will find challenging, professional, and ambitious as well as congenial and
supportive.” But even if I did not come to Lexington, Dr. Perdue said I should
consider her a friend and mentor. “If you would like me or Mike Green to take a
look at your…work on Native Americans with a view towards publishing an article
or presenting a professional paper, please let us know. Our role as teachers
does not end at the university boundary or state line, and we are happy to help
you in any way we can.” A close friend of mine asked when I read her this
letter, twenty-three years later, “Who in the academic world does something
that fantastic?” Obviously, someone exceptional, someone more interested in
supporting scholarship and teaching, and in building the ethnohistorical
nation, than in self-aggrandizement.
In
any event, when I began my studies at Kentucky I became a student of Lance Banning, an intellectual and political historian of the early American
republic, and undertook a dissertation on the Federalists’ policy toward First
Nations. These subjects lay outside of Theda’s area of interest, and yet she
and Michael Green still treated me as well as any of their own students,
pushing me to make connections with other beginning scholars and to present my
work at national conferences. As I began my own career I began to see
that this kind of network-building and encouragement were not activities Dr.
Perdue confined to her discussions with graduate students. She combined her two
professional domains, the interdisciplinary study of Native North America and
the study of the American South, not only in her staggeringly prolific
scholarship but in her leadership of the American Society for Ethnohistory and
the Southern Historical Association, and of course in the series on
Southeastern Native Americans she co-edited for Nebraska with Michael Green.
She encouraged Native Americanist scholars to build relationships with presses
normally known for Southern or for political history, in an effort to bring
entities like UNC Press or Virginia into our scholarly network.
And
she sought, either directly or through her former students, to make friends and
shape agendas in some of the most conventional, even reactionary associations.
In conversation with me some years ago about the Liberty Fund, a
quasi-libertarian foundation that hosts scholarly study groups in luxury
resorts, Theda characterized the organization as a far-right think tank
(essentially true), and in the same breath asked me to make sure she and Mike
were invited to their next conference. I maintain she was less interested in
the Liberty Fund’s promise of good food and wine than in the possibility of
making contacts – including prominent law professors and judges – who would
benefit her students, colleagues, and professional associates. Concurrently,
Theda has maintained an indirect relationship with the Society for Historians
of the Early American Republic. SHEAR’s membership includes some deeply
reactionary men, and its annual meetings always fall at the wrong time of year
for anyone engaged in serious research. However, Theda’s students, the
“southeastern Mafia” as it were, have turned the Society into an organization
far more amenable to Native American studies, and one of them, Craig Friend, is
currently the SHEAR president. Theda’s influence, like Piomingo’s, extends into
groups that may sometimes seem antithetical to our enterprise. They will not
remain so for long. The Perduvian network has proven more extensive and
persistent than the Piomingan, and has grown in pursuit of goals at least as
laudable. And unlike Piomingo, Theda built her community entirely without the
use of artillery. Well, so far as I know.
* "Scholar, Mentor, Advocate, Friend: A Celebration of Theda Perdue," 14 October 2017.
Labels:
Chickasaws,
Conferences,
Me Me Me,
Southeastern Indians,
Tributes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)