I've remarked elsewhere on my fondness
for the cult movie Escape from New York (1981), and a recent viewing
of the film with my petite amie, along with an email conversation
with my brother regarding the director's commentary (which is quite
good), got me thinking about what still makes the film compelling.
There are many answers to that question, one of which is “first-rate
acting.” Adrienne Barbeau turned a throwaway part into a major
character; Ernest Borgnine, Lee Van Cleef, and Harry Dean Stanton
showed off their decades of acting experience; Isaac Hayes brought
just the right amount of eye-twitching menace to the big villain's
part; Kurt Russell, fading teen-movie star, transformed himself into
an action hero; and Donald Pleasence played a surprisingly convincing
president.* Pleasence's chief executive was one part cipher, a blend of Nixon's charisma with Carter's effectiveness, and
one part fraying victim-turned-madman, a manifestation of Pleasence's
own experience as a POW in the Second World War. I think I would
prefer either part to one of the major-party candidates running for
president this year. So herewith I offer:
Reasons why The President in Escape
from New York was a better president than Donald Trump would be:
2) Showed respect for his social
betters (dukes, etc.)
3) Personal jetliner had more modest escape pod
4) At least minimal respect for those
who died for their country
5) Able to pray convincingly
6) Understood that tritium creates
only one one-millionth of the biological damage of iodine-131
7) Gave
useful counter-terrorism advice to member of Ford family
8) Did
not insult Native Americans, even when fighting them
9) Maintained
a decorous distance from the Russians
10) Didn't
need an escalator – could run down fifty flights of stairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment