Like most American historians, I know little of the city
of Genoa save that it was the birthplace of Christopher Columbus and that it
is located in northern Italy. Some years ago a Marxist author piqued
my interest in the early-modern Genoese by suggesting that one ought really to
call the Spanish conquest of the New World an Italian mercantile-capitalist
project. A bit of research I
recently undertook to enliven a stale lecture on Columbus has persuaded me that
there is a lot of truth to this sweeping statement.
Genoa's days of military glory were behind it by the 1400s, but its era of commercial expansion was still very much underway in
Columbus's day. In the thirteenth century a series of armed conflicts with
Venice had ended (1281) in Genoa's exclusion from the Adriatic, and in the
city-states' tacit admission that their wars with one another had grown too
expensive to prosecute. Thereafter, Venice used its geographic
advantage to dominate trade in the eastern Mediterranean, particularly the
spice and cotton trade with Egypt and the Levant. (It helped that
Venetian sailors had access to the compass, which allowed them to sail in the
open sea during the overcast winter months, and thus to take advantage of
favorable seasonal winds.) (Fernand Braudel, The Perspective of the World [1984], 33-34, 118-119; Daniel
Boorstin, The Discoverers [1985],
221-222.)
The displaced Genoese, however, merely took their capital and
expertise and transferred them to the western Mediterranean and the
eastern Atlantic Ocean. Genoese ships
had opened direct oceanic trade with Bruges in 1277, and around the same time
Genoese merchants established trading colonies in Seville, a recent conquest of the Kingdom of
Castile, and Aragon, whose king they helped conquer
Sicily in 1282. These merchants intermarried with local traders and gentry and
became part of the Spanish elite. Seville became the base for Genoese voyages to the Canary Islands in the
fourteenth century, while Genoese mercantile colonies in Morocco and
Lisbon dominated those regions' provisions trade in the fifteenth century.
(Richard Fletcher, Moorish Spain
[1992], 143; Alfred Crosby, Ecological
Imperialism [1986], 71, 79-80; Braudel, op. cit., 110, 141-142, 164; John
Kicza, "Patterns in Early Spanish Overseas Expansion," William and Mary Quarterly, Third
Series, 49 [1992]: 229-53, esp. 230, 237.)
Genoese merchants did not remain content to act as shipping
agents and bankers. Their city, whose hinterland consisted of a great many mountains, could not feed or clothe itself
without trade, and Genoa's merchants therefore took direct control of vital
resources whenever they could. Genoa financed Aragon's conquest of Sicily in
exchange for many of the island's grain plantations and control of its silk
exports. Genoese merchants also established sugar plantations in Sicily,
bringing to the western Mediterranean the crop that would play such an
important role in the history of the Atlantic World. Gradually they expanded
sugar cultivation into Spain, Portugal, Morocco, the Madeiras, and the
Canaries. (These were generally small plantations, with only a few fields and
slaves, but they provided the Genoese with experience they applied to
the larger farms of the New World). In the sixteenth century, after a Genoese navigator opened the Atlantic to
Spanish navigation, merchants from Columbus's home city sent agents to
Hispaniola to market the island's gold exports, and Genoese artisans came from
the Canaries to introduce sugar cultivation. Genoese bankers financed some of
the entradas that extended Spanish rule to the mainland, including Cortes's
conquest of the Aztec Empire in 1519-21, and Genoese bankers in Seville
provided the capital for the fleets that subsequently sailed between
Mexico and Spain. Indeed, financing the Spanish Crown and marketing Spanish
American bullion became Genoese merchants' principal pastime by the late
sixteenth century, and remained so until the Spanish government's finances
collapsed in 1627. (Braudel, 142, 157, 159-161, 163-168; Kicza,
"Patterns," 231, 242; David Graeber, Debt: The First 5,000 Years [2011], 318-319.)
So was the conquest of the Americas merely part of the
expansion of Genoese capital? The "merely" in that question gives
away the answer. Christopher Columbus may have come from Genoa, but the Genoese
did not finance his first voyage; that took a more adventurous investor, namely
a national government. Moreover, Spain provided the personnel and arsenal for
the conquest of the West Indies, Mexico, and Peru, and its conquistadors and
administrators didn't regard themselves as the employees of bankers - they fought for Church, king, and country. What the Genoese did was provide the
financial infrastructure for the empire that the Spanish built so quickly.
Those of us amazed at the speed with which Spain conquered the New World need to consider not only the impact of disease and metal
weapons on Native Americans, and not merely the expertise of Spanish sailors
and navigators, but also the large amount of money and technical know-how that
Genoa injected into the process. The bankers weren't necessarily calling the
shots in Spanish America, but they certainly became an important motive force
behind this burst of expansion that transformed Spain into a global empire in
just three quarters of a century.
You make an excellent point concerning our man Christopher Columbus and the power players that were involved. While, I knew that Columbus was Genoese...I did not think about the Impact that Genoese banking had on the Spanish in term sof its fast and brutal drive into the "New World".
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely something to think about all in all. I took the opportunity to write down the footnote sources to check the books out. If you know of any other valid books, please let me know.
-Adam
P.S. Through out the blog, I kept thinking of Genoise.