Ferguson's last few pieces of advice
seem sensible enough, as does his reminder in passing that Europe owed its rise to power
more to its institutions than to its military strength. But I'm not sure I would want to appoint
Niall-o to head any sort of Multi-National Task Force on the Current Crisis, in
part because one of his proposals, regarding balanced budgets and austerity,
would be very counter-productive right now. Setting modern Europe aside for the time being, Ferguson's
insistence
that the U.S. has reached an unsustainable level of debt elides one
essential
figure, which is the cost of servicing that debt. At present the U.S.
government spends about ten percent of outlays on interest payments (including
intra-governmental debt), which is high, but nowhere near the 50 percent paid
by the Ottomans and
Bourbons and the nearly 100% paid by the sixteenth-century Habsburgs. The reason debt-servicing costs remain low, even
as the national debt climbs to record levels, is because interest rates are
effectively zero – on some Treasury bills, they are negative. Given that the United States can essentially
charge investors for the privilege of loaning it money, it behooves the U.S.
government to borrow every penny it can lay hands on, and use the revenue to
jump-start a stagnant economy. (Yes,
this means we'll be bequeathing the millennial generation a huge debt, but
right now we're bequeathing them a 20 percent unemployment rate, which is more
damaging to their long-term economic prospects.)
Mainly I want to keep Ferg away from
policy-making because I'm not sure he's willing to support policies that
reflect his more sensible assertions.
Niall may be skeptical about the long-term correlation between military
force and world dominance, but that doesn't mean he isn't prepared to commit
American air forces to the destruction of Iran's nuclear program (as he
intimates at the end of Chapter 2). He
may favor scientific research and educational investment, but his idea of an
appropriate education would be one steeped in Western classics – all written by
British authors,** incidentally – rather than one which focused more directly on developing critical
thinking skills. Niall-o has more
recently argued that Americans shouldn't bother to invest in education, because
it won't do impoverished children any good. In April 2012 Ferguson was one of the distinguished guests at the
Millken conference, a $6,000-a-ticket gathering of the rapacious rich hosted by
Ferg's soulmate Michael Millken. When
one of the panelists, billionaire Jeff Greene, began talking about the stresses
faced by the impoverished American underclass, and suggested that with a little
more "education" and "after-school programs" poor kids
might be able to stay out of jail, Ferguson "drawled…'Dream. On.'" It
appears Niall-o doesn't really believe education will help anyone who is much
below his own income level. Presumably,
like other American conservatives, he would prefer to build more prisons, where
as punishment disaffected young people would be forced to read Ferguson's
books.
(The above photo is either of Michael Millken or Niall Ferguson; take your pick.)
*Order of the Fecking Gobshite, created by King George V in 1931, and awarded quasi-annually since then.
**
The author has decided to reserve discussion of Ferguson's ideal core
curriculum for another blog post, as this one is already long.
No comments:
Post a Comment